![]() Attorney General Karl Racine wrote they were taking the step “to protect the viability of our prosecutions.” In an April 23 letter to the head of the Department of Forensic Sciences, then-U. Some of those discrepancies involved cases in which the independent examiners were able to match bullets or cartridge casings where the lab’s examiners were not.Īccording to court documents, prosecutors have been using outside experts for at least the past six months to reexamine all ballistics evidence handled by the forensic lab in cases currently scheduled to go to trial. Department of Forensic Science’s firearms unit. In six of those cases, auditors came up with different conclusions about the evidence than examiners at the D.C. Superior Court and found discrepancies in 12 separate cases. So far, that audit, which began in the spring and is being made public for the first time through this WTOP report, has reviewed 60 cases in D.C. have opened a sweeping audit into the handling of ballistics evidence by the District’s forensic lab after the discovery of a botched analysis that falsely linked two killings - a review that could throw into question evidence in other cases. (WTOP/Megan Cloherty)įederal prosecutors in D.C. The Firearms Examination Unit houses the guns it collects from crimes inside the city’s department of forensics. Business & Finance Click to expand menu.The company has denied such a practice and said it has a policy against it. California has been asking Amazon about the company's private label products and whether it uses the data from third-party sellers to inform which products it sells, according to the Times report, which noted that the inquiries in California and Washington do not appear to be in advanced stages.Īmazon used sensitive, confidential information about sellers on its marketplace, their products and transactions to develop its own competing products, according to a Wall Street Journal report in April. In May, the House Judiciary Committee asked Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos to testify about the company's competition practices. The US Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission are pursuing antitrust probes into Amazon, Google, Facebook and Apple. The state inquiries come amid heightened government scrutiny into big technology companies and their impact on competition and consumers. The reports cited unnamed persons familiar with the matter.Īmazon and the state attorneys general in California and Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment Saturday. Also on Friday, The New York Times reported that state investigators in Washington are reviewing Amazon's handling of third-party sellers on its site. The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that California is examining the retail giant's business practices, focusing partly on how Amazon treats independent sellers on its platform. State officials in California and Washington are reviewing Amazon's business practices to determine whether the company is violating any laws with respect to the independent merchants that sell goods on its site, according to published reports. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |